If you buy something using links in our stories, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
Regular readers will remember my outraged rant post from almost a year ago, reacting to the news that the Central Intelligence Agency faked a vaccination campaign in Pakistan as a way of getting close to Osama Bin Laden's hide-out, hoping to prove his presence by using a vaccine needle to grab a sample of DNA.
I felt, and still feel, that the maneuver -- which was belatedly acknowledged by the CIA -- was a cynical attempt to hijack the credibility that public health workers have built up over decades with local populations. I especially felt it endangered the status of the fraught polio-eradication campaign, which over the past decade has been challenged in majority-Muslim areas in Africa and South Asia over beliefs that polio vaccination is actually a covert campaign to harm Muslim children -- an accusation that seems fantastic, but begins to make sense when you realize some of those areas have perfectly good reasons to distrustvaccination campaigns.
I take no pleasure in saying the prediction came true. Both The Guardian and the news website OnIslam reported in March that polio eradication in Pakistan -- one of the three countries where polio stubbornly persists because of internal conflict -- has been hampered by the fake campaign. From OnIslam:
I bring this back up now because there is news today about the doctor, Shakil Afridi, who conducted the fake campaign on behalf of the United States. According to the New York Times and Reuters, he has been convicted of treason. From the Times:
The Guardian, which led on this story all along, reports that the US is quietly pressuring Pakistan to let Afridi go. Pakistan views recruiting one of its citizens into a covert operation within its borders as an offense against its sovereignty. The US is countering that the operation just happened to be in Pakistan, but was against al-Qaeda and bin Laden, who had been denounced by the United Nations Security Council and thus were fair game wherever they happened to be:
The commenters at the New York Times -- 126 so far -- do an unusually good job of filling in the back-story, mentioning the Congressional vote yesterday that cut aid to Pakistan by 58 percent, and the NATO strike last November that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers. Pakistan is one of the lead recipients of US aid, receiving $20 billion since the 9/11 attacks in 2001, according to Reuters.
The descending spiral of US-Pakistan relations clearly won't hit bottom anytime soon. It's sickening to think that the polio campaign, always teetering on the asymptote of eradication but never quite getting there, will be part of the collateral damage.
(Self-promotion alert: The original post on the sham CIA campaign was selected for The Best Science Writing Online 2012, which will be published in September. Pre-orders availablehere.)